>Why do you think ISO 3200 would be necessary? Concert shots often have to be underexposed 1-2 stops, due to spotlights and dark background. By doing so, a 400 ISO film becomes an 800-1600 ISO film. Similar for digital. In my experience the Fuji Superia 1600 is great for concert shots. It's actually less grainy than the Fuji Superia 800.
However, the Tilbury Hotel shots are not really stage shots with a lot of spotlights, so perhaps 3200 was necessary. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Raimo K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 8. januar 2005 08:59 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: GESO: Slowhand at the Tilbury Hotel Why do you think ISO 3200 would be necessary? I have found that ISO 400 is sufficient and you can get by even with ISO 100 film. All the best! Raimo K Personal photography homepage at: http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derby Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax Discuss" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:50 PM Subject: Re: GESO: Slowhand at the Tilbury Hotel > Derby Chang wrote: > >> >> My first gallery-every-so-often for the year. >> >> Late last year, my friend did a pleasant show at the Tilbury Hotel. >> Special guest singer, Noah Taylor. >> >> http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/Tilbury_slowhand/index.htm >> >> MZ-5, naked 77mm Ltd (no UV filter :) a mix of Neopan, Fuji Press and >> >> D >> > > ...err, and Tmax 3200 >
