[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Yes, that many. The pros have swung to digital faster than you can say, >"What happened to film?" When your livelihood depends on being able to >produce great photographs with minimal expense and in the lest amount >of time, you go for the best solution.
Two jobs I did this summer: Shot the superbike races at Mid-Ohio. Took about 300 shots before lunch and 300 in the afternoon. The web site I was working for (superbikeplanet.com) had them within 90 minutes of the end of racing both days. Anything less is unacceptable for any kind of news coverage these days. Did some advertising shots for an agency (working on an ad campaign for my local organic food co-op). Took a couple of hundred shots in a 2-hour session. All with perfect (or at least very close!) white balance in the mixed daylight/tungsten/fluorescent lighting (yes, I reset the custom white balance a lot - very quick and easy to do). This was for print so I mailed them a CD with the images the next day. This is the way it is. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
