----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Urmos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: May 14, 2001 7:34 PM Subject: OT: Kodak Packaging > > I realize that none of you aliterates are likely to read this, or even get > to the bullet points, but here goes: > > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23370-2001May13.html I'll read it when I get a moment.......... William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- RE: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: the d... Peifer, William [OCDUS]
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... Fabrice Gamberini
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... Michael Nosal
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... John Francis
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy trut... petit miam
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... Peter Alling
- OT: Kodak Packaging Joe Urmos
- Re: Kodak Packaging Douglas E Harmon
- OT: Re: Kodak Packaging Doug Franklin
- Re: Kodak Packaging William Robb
- Re: Kodak Packaging Gary L. Murphy
- Re: Kodak Packaging Joe Urmos
- Re: Kodak Packaging martin tammer
- Re: Kodak Packaging, alitera... admin
- Re: OT: Kodak Packaging Shel Belinkoff
- Re: OT: Kodak Packaging Norman Baugher
- Re: OT: Kodak Packaging Bob Walkden
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy trut... petit miam

