Thanks Shel for looking, in any case.

j

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:59:11 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I went back and looked at this a couple of times.  We're just going to have
> to disagree.  For the most part, everything you like about the photo is
> something I dislike.
> 
> Shel
> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > On 15/1/05, Shel Belinkoff
> >
> > <http://www.jbuhler.com/blog/archives/00000166.html>
> >
> > >OK, since I find this to be very much less than a good shot, would you
> (or
> > >anyone) be kind enough to explain what makes it good and why you like
> it.
> > >I'd like to keep an open mind on this.
> > >
> >
> > Sure. I like the placement of all the subjects, people, bar, walls,
> > shapes etc. I like the colours, some slightly odd hues etc. I like the
> > expression on the main subject's face - looking for a friend / bartender
> > / whatever, the hands clasped with appropriate blur. I like the slightly
> > tilted angle. It all adds up to a good shot - although in a way it's too
> > good - hence it could easily be used by a stock house. If I had half a
> > dozen extras, lighting kit, a whole bar, and an hour, I could maybe come
> > up with a similar shot (and a few dozen others). It would sit nicely in a
> > picture library, and be used for a feature on credit card fraud in the
> > business pages of a Sunday paper.
> >
> > Instead, Juan popped it off in a few seconds. He da man!
> 
> 


-- 
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog

Reply via email to