On 16/1/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:

>Why?  Do you find that shooting digital affords better final quality
>prints?

Yes. I needed a print from some 200 ISO colour neg recently, so I scanned
it and printed it off and frankly I was shocked at the *grain*  !! 
Digital originals are so much smoother.

>Are most of your photos destined for the web or email in some way,
>bypassing prints in most instances?

When I shoot a picture my thoughts are always to print. I only ever shoot
at one quality level, which is large/fine jpeg. This suits me better than
RAW. I have printed from RAW and jpeg and I can see no difference (but
then wadda I know ;-) Some get squeezed down for my web site or for email.

>If you make prints, how large are
>they?

Usually 11 by 8 inch. For landscapes that get framed, 16 by 11 inch or
thereabouts.


>(Did you send my high quality B&W print yet?)

Ah yes yes yes yes yes. No. It's on the to-do list.

>Do you prefer digital
>because you can bypoass the darkroom?

Absolutely, but not the primary reason. I don't mind developing film, but
it is a drudge. I like digital because the images are much cleaner, and I
prefer them over film.

>Did you do your own darkroom work
>before moving to digital?

No. I got back into photography properly when I got a scanner. I would
shoot neg (mono, I processed, colour went to the lab) and then scan. I
*hate* scanning. I have wet printed but that was back at art college in
1978, and then for a few years afterwards in a darkroom at my father's
place of work.

>I ask because, for me, it seems that the reason to move to digital is
>because there are times when I'm just too lazy to process film at home
>(I've always disliked processing film - B-O-R-I-N-G), or don't want to
>spend the time traveling to and from the lab to get the film processed. 
>Actually, the more i think about it, the more I realize that what digital
>means to me, and the main reason I'm considering it,  is that I won't have
>to spend time processing film, either at home or driving to the lab.  If I
>could shoot film and have it processed to my standards without having to
>spend the time doing it myself, I'd not be thinking about digital at all
>except for simple snaps for eBay and to send Q&D pics to family and
>friends, and that sort of thing.

O Lord, Shel go buy an *ist D!




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________


Reply via email to