That's a strange argument. You mean there are a lot of amateurs who are turning down 10K a day paychecks just to preserve their amateur status? Are they something like the olympic athletes of photography. truomg to preserve their amateur status by not acceptin money for their work? If they're really setting the standards, why wouldn't they capitalize on it? Are they all that pure?
I dont' give a rat's ass what kind of technology is used to make a picture. If glass plates worked best, I would shoot with those. And as you know, just a couple of years ago, I was certain that film was still the way to go. But I'm not so blind that I can ignore the evidence. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions... > > > > Hmm, > > Makes me wonder why the pros are printing their BW digital. > > Probably because the work is good enough to keep the clients happy. > Without wanting to step on anyone's toes, quite often the pro boys > aren't doing the best work out there. It's the knowedgable and > skilled amateurs who are the benchmarks. > > William Robb > >
