I am actually pro digital --especially for professional use which has nothing to do with quality but everything to do with making profits--, but I find I have to argue for film for the exact reasons Frantisek mentions. And not having invested thousands on digital equipment I do not have to "justify" it to myself.
graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" -----------------------------------
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 16 Jan 2005 at 23:00, Frantisek wrote:
...but surely many people are helping it into the grave by saying "it is" all over the internet. If you are so happy with digital, why the need for voicing it so strongly? It's a tool, not religion.
I think you are mislead if you think the demise of film is even partly due to discussions floating about the internet. How many people who were absolutely pro film on-line changed their views upon the use of a decent digital camera?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 1/16/2005
