Jens Bladt wrote:
Didn't Contax make one too....?
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 17. januar 2005 22:42 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: *istD AF performance (was Re: Sigma 2.8 Zoom lens comments)
Just the Canon, and the Kodak semi twins, (c/n), are full frame as far as I can recall.
Jens Bladt wrote:
?I don't know the 1Ds. But, I believe 95% of all digies are less than full frame. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 17. januar 2005 12:48 Til: pentax list Emne: Re: *istD AF performance (was Re: Sigma 2.8 Zoom lens comments)
On 17/1/05, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
T answer his question: Yes, there's is a difference. Due to the grater enlargement (crop factor) the shutter speed necessary to "freeze" movent must be divided by the crop factor: If i.e. a 250mm is used: 1/250
divided
I mean for crying out loud, it's a 1Ds - there *is no crop factor*by i.e. 1.5 = 1/375 sec.
90% out of focus! That bad!
involved - it's a full frame camera. What planet do these people come from
Cheers, Cotty
___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
-- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
