In the expected place; it's a private field in the MakerNote tag in the EXIF information (private tag #41, I believe)
The number seems to be a little higher than the frame number embedded in the file name, even if you don't reset that (and it doesn't wrap at 9999; it's a full 32-bit value). I'd surmise that the difference reflects testing/manufacturing steps that exercise the shutter and/or the sensor. Bruce Dayton mused: > > Hello John, > > So, where to look? Care to share? > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Monday, January 17, 2005, 12:22:12 PM, you wrote: > > > JF> I expect they almost all do, if you know where to look. > JF> Pentax certainly include this in the *ist-D. > > > JF> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:33:12PM -0500, Herb Chong wrote: > >> i know many of the Canon and Kodak ones do. i don't know if there are any > >> others. > >> > >> Herb.... > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 9:21 AM > >> Subject: RE: What's the outlook? > >> > >> > >> >do any of the DSLRs on the market have lifetime exposure counters? > >> >why not? > >> > > >> >In general, I do not think I would ever buy ANY digital camera > >> >used, DSLR or not. Too many possible glitches that you might > >> >not discover until too late... I would rather go with new and > >> >warranteed with a digital.... > >> > > > >
