It must be hotmail screwing things up. Your message (Dave) just came in
full of gibberish, but my prior one was OK.
Tom C.
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Pentax Z-1
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:34:10 -0500
I don't see crap either way..lol.
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Pentax Z-1
>
>
> I didn't get crap when I sent via hotmail with IE, now I'm replying
using
> Mozilla
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
> >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: Pentax Z-1
> >Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:50:33 -0700
> >
> >I'm sending this using IE instead of Mozilla... just to see if it's the
> >browser.
> >
> >
> >
> >Tom C.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: Tim Sherburne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Reply-To: [email protected]
> >>To: Pentax Discussion List <[email protected]>
> >>Subject: Re: Pentax Z-1
> >>Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:37:02 -0800
> >>
> >>
> >>Email coming to me from PDML has been free of crap (well, strange
> >>character
> >>crap anyway).
> >>
> >>t
> >>
> >>On 1/20/05 12:27, Tom C wrote:
> >>
> >> > Do you guys see all the strange character crap in my posts (besides
> >>what I
> >> > write), or is it just me? The last several mails have come
> back with
> >> > +ADw-tt+AD4 gibberish. I can send a mail to myself, and it doesn't
> >>showup.
> >> > Nor does it show up when I reply to my own posts to myself where I
> >>quote my
> >> > original post that contains the junk.
> >> >
> >> > Tom C.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> Reply-To: [email protected]
> >> >> To: [email protected]
> >> >> Subject: RE: Pentax Z-1
> >> >> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:41:27 -0700
> >> >>
> >> >> Peter,
> >> >>
> >> >> I normally shoot in matrix metering mode. If I suspect there be
an
> >>issue
> >> >> of any kind due to odd lighting conditions, I'll adjust EV +/- and
> >>bracket
> >> >> manually. Of course with a non-A lens, center-weighted
> metering takes
> >> >> precedence.
> >> >>
> >> >> Tom C.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
