On Jan 21, 2005, at 5:38 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It would be what, about a 300mm equiv. on the istD?
That'd be about right. My FA200/2.8 is telling me it wants to behave like a smaller, lighter 300/2.8. It's Cotty's fault.
Maybe instead of buying a digital body I could just cut my film into smaller pieces.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
