Marnie, I agree with Ken and would like to see all the fingers and finger tips.
Then I thought about her face... Why can't we see her face? Why the cliche of the hands? I guess that I'd like to see her wrinkles and all. Maybe you could get a twinkle in her eye, or a dour expression or whatever. Those hands are just too neutral. My mom's gone now, but I occasionally catch a glimps of her in my daughter. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:25:57 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 1/21/2005 8:30:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Great idea. > My reaction to this is that I would take it in a portrait orientation, to > acentuate the proportions of the hands & eliminat the extraneous upper LH > corner > & include the finger tips from both hand. > > Kenneth Waller > =========== > Yes, I have some, a little less close, with all the finger tips. I may need > to PS corners, as the conditions do not really allow me to eliminate all the > background when I am shooting (i.e. using a model who won't sit long, not > having > a good background, a good chair, good lighting, etc.) I was wondering if not > having the finger tips in this particular picture would bother anyone. And I > suppose PSing out some background wouldn't be cheating. :-) > > Thanks, Marnie :-) (Resent.) > >
