Doing the right thing... (my onw view)
As long as you are isolated from the criminal OK. Explain the police
officers what you are, I am a photographer
and I steped on these peoples... show photos and other documents. AND KEEP
LOW PROFILE. MOVE !
Don't endanger yourself or your close. THINK !
Local police guy came to me , shook my hand just for bringing to their
attention some details. I hope the guy is now
in jail.
-When there is an accident I stop.
-When there is something that can endanger someone I do the best I can.
If what you see is illegal or you beleive it is illegal then it is your
responsibility to do something. I would not like to see
what kind of trouble you would have keeping these evidences from the law
enforcement. One stupid example
-AAH these dumb kids are trading dope...
Week after readin in the newspaper
-young guy/girl 12 - 20 die overdose / stabed to death
lifting a flag will make a difference, letting the right people to their job
will bring the best of the whole situation.
Philippe
> Glenn,
>
> Just out of curiosity, where do you live?
>
> Paul
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Drug Dealer Lens?
>
>
> > I'm not familiar with either lens, but for my money, I'd definitely go
> with
> > the 400. I can't imagine softness out weighing the inreased
magnification.
> > The choice of film would IMHO have more of an effect on softness. After
> > you've got the image you might be suprised what they can reveal in
> > Photoshop.
> > Ken Waller
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: D. Glenn Arthur Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:46 PM
> > Subject: Drug Dealer Lens?
> >
> >
> > > So I'm shooting from a third floor window, across a wide (two
> > > travel lanes and two parking lanes) street with sidewalks,
> > > using TMZ at 6400. Either the 400mm/6.3 preset (Spiratone) or
> > > the 200mm/4 (Pentax SMC) is going to draw attention if I'm
> > > actually _in_ the window, so I'm shooting from well back in
> > > the room.
> > >
> > > The question is: Am I better off going with the longer but softer
> > > 400mm to fill more of the frame, or taking my chances with grain on
> > > a smaller image using the sharper (and easier to hold) 200mm? The
> > > sun hasn't quite set yet, so I can get hand-holding speeds (1/1000
> > > actually, as of fifteen minutes ago, probably 1/500 now) with either
> > > lens at the moment.
> > >
> > > In the viewfinder, using the 400mm, I can clearly see the money
> > > changing hands, but it's not sharp enough to make out denominations.
> > >
> > > (Yes, I have a tripod. If I find a good angle where I can use
> > > it, I may see whether anything interesting is happening late
> > > tonight when I get home from rehearsal. And yes, I plan to ask
> > > the vice squad whether they're interested in the film.)
> > >
> > > -- Glenn
> > >
> > > -
> > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> >
> >
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
