Well, thanks for a constructive-minded answer very much!! Peter, Sweden >In a message dated 1/23/2005 12:59:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> well, thanks for all your enthralling answers! >> >BTW What would you recommend as a good Mac-compatible scanner? >> >Peter, Sweden >============= >I have the Epson 2400. There are higher models numbers than that now. I >didn't need a dedicated film scanner. It works fine for me -- although it >will only >do four at a time. I have done both negatives and slides and been quite happy >with the results. Probably Mac compatible. Probably most Epsons are. No idea. > >With a DSLR now, I don't scan anymore. > >Marnie aka Doe
- Re: AW: Travelling *istD/DS (was:Di... Rob Studdert
- AW: AW: Travelling *istD/DS (wa... Michael Heim
- Re: AW: AW: Travelling *istD/DS... Rob Studdert
- Re: AW: AW: Travelling *istD/DS... Michael Heim
- Re: Digital anguish Eactivist
- Re: Digital anguish Joseph Tainter
- Re: Digital anguish pnstenquist
- Re: Digital anguish mike wilson
- Re: Digital anguish William Robb
- Re: Digital anguish Eactivist
- Re: Digital anguish Peter Smekal
- Re: Digital anguish Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Digital anguish David Mann
- Re: Digital anguish Godfrey DiGiorgi
- Re: Digital anguish David Mann
- RE: Digital anguish Nick Clark
- Re: Digital anguish johnf
- Re: Digital anguish Bob W
- RE: Digital anguish Jens Bladt
- Re: Digital anguish Peter J. Alling
- Re: Digital anguish Bob W

