When the MZ-S came out -- and when I was able to check one out in the store (there was a significant interval between these) I concluded, based on comparing specs and then on comparing the cameras, that for me the MZ-s could not replace the PZ-1. I thought at the time that the only way I'd ever go for an MZ-s was if something happpened to my ZX-5n (I wouldn't want to give up the -5n; I just like it; but the -S could *replace* it if need be, I thought). However, things have changed: The -5n is now out of commission, but I am unlikely to replace it (or repair it) because I now have an *istD; I just don't need something in the niche formerly occupied by my ZX-5n.
But I do agree with the point, made elsewhere in the thread, that there probably is not *a* definite "best film body" made by Pentax. That's one reason I disagreed with the statement that the MZ-S was the "best film body" -
- because I don't think it can be claimed that the MZ-S is a better body than the PZ-1, the PZ-1p, the LX, the 645N (and probably some others with which I'm not familiar) ... For me, as noted above, I felt that it was NOT a better body than the PZ-1. I would agree with putting it in a group of "the best bodies", but I don't think it stands out by itself.
ERNR
For me: Modular construction of the LX LX weatherproofing LX Shutter capability (but not the noise - ME-Super) LX meter Z1-p shutter speeds (not possible with LX style shutter....) Flash comp & synch speed of the Z1-p Stats printing of the MZ-S
Not sure which model's ergonomics I would go for.
mike
