I've noticed on that J Cowell's price index lists the F 50/1.4 as selling for slightly more than the FA 50/1.4. Is this an aberration in his statistics, or is the F a better lens? I'm guessing construction quality would be the only difference. I've always understood the construction of the F series to be weak.
Tim On 1/24/05 13:55, William Robb wrote: > > FWIW, if you come across an FA50/1.4, it is a very nice lens. > > William Robb > > >
