Whoa... that's pretty cool.  I wouldn't call it a lie.  It's an image.

Tom C.



From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: How'd they do it? (was:Dogmatism: what is allowed?)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:55:48 +1000

On 24 Jan 2005 at 16:43, Tom C wrote:

> My own two eyes always 'represent my own personal representation of
> something' to my brain. If this is the definition of a lie then to discuss the
> ability of a photo to lie is moot.


Don't know where this type of image fits into the lie cheat subvert argument
but it's obviously a representation from a point in space with little margin
for creative cropping :-) So how did he shoot it from where he did?


http://www.erik-krause.de/pano/verdon/index.htm

The Quicktime version is amazing.


Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998





Reply via email to