OK. There's different kind of journalists, or journalism. The ones that feel htat they want to tell stories, want to show "how the world is". They should have tho goal to be as near at reality as possible. The you have political journalism (in a wider sense). Those journalists want to change something, want to be the world a little bit like they want. That starts at a daily newspaper with a light political direction and ends at a kampfblatt (propaganda) from either left or right end of the range. But would you beliefe what's printed in a cuban party newspaper?
So. It doesnt matter how hard, but in a way, every journalist should be willing to stay at the trouth. He shoult try. Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2005 02:53 An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Betreff: Re: AW: Dogmatism: what is allowed? why? mishka On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:17:20 +0100, Michael Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's not strange. Without that goal media wouln't work any more. > > Michael > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Januar 2005 01:57 > An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Betreff: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed? > > frank, i agree with you 99%, wxcept this part, which i find a bit > strange (strange that someone has this kind of expectations of the > second oldest > profession) > > > On the other hand, if I pick up a newspaper, I expect that what's > > being reported should be grounded in facts, and represent that which > > the reporter believes to be true, accurate, and based on an > > objective reality. > > ... > > cheers, > > frank > > best, > mishka > >
