> I've read either here or on DPReview or both that Pentax macros are better > than the best 3rd-party macros, including the Tamron 90 and the Sigma 105. > What about the K/M/A 100/4.0 Macro -- is it also better than the Tamron 90 > and the Sigma 105?
I've had the chance to try many a 100-ish macro lens (90mm-105mm), and I do have to say that I've never found one that wasn't at least very good. (Note that I'm not claiming that they're all good, and there might possibly be exceptions.) I suspect that the differences would be fairly small. Fred
