> The Pz-1/PZ-1p had both options. That's a progress! Yes that's good, I could live with that.
John ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:02:51 +0100 Subject: RE: Things I like about aperture rings on lenses (was Re: Pentax 50mm News) > The Pz-1/PZ-1p had both options. That's a progress! As far as flash > photography goes, the *ist D has too. > Someday, someone might make a camera, without the aperture simulator, > but with the e-wheel moved from the body to the lens :-)) > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 27. januar 2005 00:10 > Til: [email protected] > Emne: Re: Things I like about aperture rings on lenses (was Re: > Pentax 50mm News) > > On 26 Jan 2005 at 21:59, John Whittingham wrote: > > > Now that's what I'd call progress :) > > Hmm, yes, I still haven't seen such a list to show why thumb-wheel control > is > such an advantage over lens based aperture control :-) > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 ------- End of Original Message -------
