Would it make sense to resize in increments in the RAW convertor then?
rg
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi Juan, I readed somewhere in the web (I think it was hidden inside the adobe website), a tutorial about PS Raw converter, and the author (an expert, user of PS for several years and tester for adobe) said the algorithms used in the converter were better than the used in bicubic in main PS (he mentioned the usual method of resizing in 10% increments), so he recommended using the converter to resize. Regards
Albano
--- Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is for the few PS experts we have in the list.
When reading in a PEF file with the CS raw
converter, do you ever use
a higher resolution than the default of 3008x2008? Is there any
advantage to this, ie is it any different than
resizing the image up
later if you have a reason to?
j
-- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog
=====
Albano Garcia
Photography & Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com
