> Actually, I am not sure that $159 is the best price I've seen - I think > I've seen 'em go for less, at least sometimes.
In retrospect, I think I am wrong on that - I think I've seen them go for less than $200, but probably not less than $150, and that probably is a good price. (Sorry - I guess that it must have been one of my not-as-infrequent-as-they-used-to-be senior moments - <g>.) Fred
