On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:13:53 -0800, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > I dropped by a local waterfall today and was experimenting with the long > exposure setting on my family's new digital p&s. It goes down to 4sec, > which is 3sec longer than my SLR (one of my main gripes about the P3n), but > the aperture doesn't close very far so I was holding a lens from my > dismembered sunglasses in front of it. By the time I had hiked in I only > had fifteen minutes to actually take pictures but here is what I got. > > http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/waterfalls.html > > Brutal critiques appreciated. > > Thanks in advance.
Sadly, I don't think I can be brutal. I don't know why, but I'm always a sucker for the "long exposure to make the moving water look cool" shots. I know they're cliche, but I like 'em. Beyond that, I like the composition. That rock at the bottom is a real nice touch; balances the image nicely. Very well done, IMHO. thanks, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
