I do plan  to get a 28mm eventually. The reason I want a telephoto first is
there are some pictures that I would like to take from the side of the road.
I would really hate to get arrested for trespassing. :-) BTW, I see that keh
has some very nice prices, but that they say a lense in excellent condition
may have some dust. Is this normal? Will it affect the picture quality any?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 1:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: New K1000 owner

Hi! Welcome to the madness that is this list. :)

I bought a Sears 80-200/4 from a friend for $20, it's
not been bad for such a cheap lens. Local shops seem
to have the same lens around $40-$50. If you want
something likely better, check out the SMC Pentax-A
70-210/4. 

If you'd rather have some primes, look into a 100mm or
135mm and 200mm. 

I bought from a list member a SMC Pentax-M 135/3.5
that I've lately considered selling, though it has a
couple minor issues. It only focuses out to about
75-100 feet and the hood tends to not stay put. These
are probably fixable... the hood is no big deal, and I
only noticed the focus issue when taking pictures of
boats out on the water.

Pick up a 28mm or so wide angle if you come across
one. I have a SMC Pentax-M 28/3.5 I've been very happy
with. I've found wide angle lenses to be more fun than
telephoto. 

-Jon Myers.


--- Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello all. I just got me a K1000 from a pawn shop
> with the standard 50mm
> lenses. It seems to work fine. My question though is
> about lenses. I'm
> looking for a decent zoom. I'm thinking 70-210 or
> thereabouts. Any
> suggestions? I'm looking to keep it under $100 if
> possible. I can go higher
> if needed. 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Reply via email to