On 9/2/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >Lately I've been taking advantage of my access to an Epson 7500 inkjet >at the store where I work and made some big prints. Done a few 18 x 24 >inch prints and been impressed with the quality. A couple of days ago I >went whole hog and ran off a 24 x 36 inch print. It's an entirely >different experience from doing "normal" size prints. Imperfections that >don't show up at 12 x 18 are obvious when you get to double those >dimensions! Obviously, only the best, sharpest images have any hope of >standing up to this amount of magnification and ideally you'd want to be >shooting medium format also. Still, with top-notch glass and good >technique, it's amazing what 35mm can achieve. > >I'll bring a couple to GFM in June :) >The image I printed Monday is this one: >http://www.robertstech.com/graphics/pages/7d303108.htm >MZ-S, FA*24/2.0, Kodak E100VS
Mark, how would an *ist D image stand up at 36X24 ? Any tests? Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
