Martin Trautmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I did not read the KAF3 patents myself (three from 2001?). I doubt that they >would provide real information how the mount would look like. But there >should not be only less than KAF2, but somehow more. This may be hidden >within the digital contact, being information only. But maybe some further >contacts or mount extension will be required which would proof that current >lenses and bodies are not yet KAF3.
I'll bet you 500 Quatloos that IS/USM contacts eventually show up in the area where the "aperture simulator" ring used to be :) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
