Perhaps the MX and RefA might have a compatability problem? RefM would be of the same manufacturing period as MX. Have only the RefM so can't be sure but your posting would suggest just that. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pawel Bartuzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:08 PM Subject: Refconverter A and a MX
> I would like to ask refconverter A owners here on the list: does your > refconverter stay at 90 angle in relation to a camera back or does it go > down a little? Mine looks as if it looked into viewfinder a little from > under the center of a viewfinder (like in > www.pentax.ca/support/manual_pdfs/accessories/REFConverter.pdf > <http://www.pentax.ca/support/manual_pdfs/accessories/REFConverter.pdf> > - I _think_ I can see that the bottom of the refconverter is not at 90 > angle with the MX back). Also, when looking with x2 magnification I see > that the center of a frame (the split image) is not centered in the > refconverter but rather in a lower part of the refconverters field of > view. Is it normal? > > Pawel > >
