Correction; it's actually the A, not the M, that I have, and that is a
better bet for the DSLRs, though optically the same as the M.
John
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:36:30 -0000, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most people prefer the greater reach of the longer lens.
If cost is a consideration, go for the M 100mm f4. If not, the F/FA
100mm f2.8 is faster, possibly a fraction sharper, and the AF, whilst
pointless for macro, is useful if using the lens for non-macro purposes
on an AF camera.
The f2.8 is bigger than, and nearly twice the weight of, the f4.
I have both, don't ask me why, and can't decide which to get rid of.
So, following Robb's doctrine, I'll probably keep both.
John
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:23:13 -0600, Chad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking to buy a macro lens, again. Used to have one but now
anymore. Long story. Which lens do you like to use most often for
macro pics, the 50mm or the 100mm? I lean a little towards the 50mm
since it will be cheaper, however, having the extra reach might be
useful. I will be using the lens on a digital and film bodies if it
makes a difference.
Thanks,
Chad
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
