Hmmm, the vertical one is a nice windmill pic, but it feels kind of standard. 
Not much going on here. A very tight crop might help. I think part of the 
problem is that a windmill is a classic photographic subject that we've all 
seen before. A really unusual perspective that still makes a nice composition 
would probably win the day.
Paul


> Sometime during 14/02/2005, Jens Bladt & Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >I agree with Paul.
> >To me compostition is about how to take the eyes of the spectatores for a I
> >ride around/into the picture.
> >So, often, it's about lines.
> >It's also about light. The bright parts seem to catch the eyes first.
> >Bright parts of a photograph need to be important(essential - or at least to
> >lead the eyes to where the messages is.
> >This is one of the reasons, that a portrait with a very bright background
> >(passport photographs) are rarely very pleasing.
> >The eyes want to wander away from the face and the essential part of the
> >image. This can be mended in a way, by creating dark corners (oposite
> >vignetting) - to create a bright, central part of the image.
> >
> >Jens Bladt
> >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
> >
> >
> >-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> >Fra: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >You have a very good sense of composition and frame. I find almost all
> >of these quite excellent. The only exception would be the windmill,
> >which appears somewhat awkward and disjointed to my eye. But the others
> >are very good. The staircase is a great composition, so too the
> >graffiti. The frosted tree is a very pretty shot. Nice work and welcome
> >to the list.
> >Paul Stenquist
> 
> [ Re this photo http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1695498 ]
> 
> Thanks for the comments. I found another couple of photos of that windmill 
> I'd taken at the time. I'm not sure either solve any of the problems, but...
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3121854
> which seems to be leaning over slightly, and then from a bit further back
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3121870
> which might benefit from being cropped a little on the left and perhaps right.
> 
> Eric. 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to