- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: CCD cleaning
I use a sterile ear syringe, which can be purchased at a drug store. A couple blasts of air from the syringe bulb, and you're done. Mark Cassino suggested this method. It's very safe and quite effective. Keep the syringe in its box or a sealed plastic bag when not in use.
Paul
Can Sensor brush remove dust that is stuck hard to the sensor or you would have
to go back to using eclipse for that ?
I don't care so much about the price if it works good and it is reusable for
multiple cleanings.
Are these two product the best for this ?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: CCD cleaning
> I was using the Eclipse/sensor swab/pec pad cleaning rig for a > while, but I find the Sensor Brush sold by Visible Dust to do a > better job and it's a lot easier to use. Not cheap but worth it. > > http://www.visibledust.com/sensorbrush.htm > > Godfrey > > --- David Zaninovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What is the best way to clean the sensor on D ? > > I have few dust specks that are clearly visible at f32, at 1:1 > > with macro lens, not that I use f32, too blurry. I think they > > are in > > focus at that point. :) > > They disappear almost completely by f11 but I don't want to > > have them anyway if I don't have to. They are not visible in > > non-macro > > pictures. > > > > First stuck pixels, now this... :) Well, it is still better > > than waiting for developing and then scanning. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >

