> My sister has got one of those Praktica Carl Zeiss 24 mm. 2.8 > (bayonet) lenses, it is made of metal,
The early Sigmas were metal, very well constructed the only really fault being the markings tended to wear off the barrel. John ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Carlos Royo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:30:59 +0100 Subject: Re: Was KA mount Carl Zeiss Jena lenses, now Leica lenses from Japan > Frantisek escribi�: > > > There was a long discussion about this lens (2.8/24) on Praktica users > > group. I don't remember the facts now, but I can maybe still find it > > somewhere. I think there were several versions of the lens, some not > > plasticky at all. > > > > My sister has got one of those Praktica Carl Zeiss 24 mm. 2.8 > (bayonet) lenses, it is made of metal, and I think it is a very good > performer. It is made in Japan, so I think it was made by Sigma, > like the Prakticar 70-210 mm. she also has. > > Carlos ------- End of Original Message -------
