Amen to that, Paul. I've had no complaints from stock houses, individual publication buyers, or folks buying prints at art fairs and galleries. From a workflow perspective, I would _much_ rather sell an image shot on the *sty D for publication than anything shot on film - though I started working with one agency who has a couple of clients who still insist on film. So die-hard film purchasers are still out there.

My own experience has been that lenses with fairly low resolution, but good edge sharpness and low chromatic aberration levels work great on he the *ist, even if they were mediocre with film. I put my Tokina ATX 400 f5.6 in that category - the bird shots I take with it on the *ist D are great. With Velvia or E100S, I never felt like it delivered the detail. The A* 400 f2.8, even with a telecovnerter, was a better setup (for film.).

As with film, the A* 200 f4 is my workhorse with the *ist-D, and as expected it delivers. Having said that, I used my FA 28-70 f4 quite a bit with tie *ist-D this summer, and have no complaints re the results - but I have always felt that I was lucky to have a good sample of that lens.

- MCC

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Manual Focus Pentax Glass on istD



Perhaps my standards are low, but I'm quite pleased with the performance of all my lenses on the *istD. I even like the results I've achieved witht the much maligned FA 80-320. My manual focus lenses, which are mostly k series glass, have produced images that please me greatly. I've also had good feedback from the magazine I shoot for and the stock houses. All of these clients had been receiving 6x7 transparencies and/or scans from me. They've had nothing but good things to say about the digital images that I've been providing for the last year. I really can't fault any of my lenses on the *istD.
Paul





Reply via email to