I disagree. Most common size, as I understand it, is 1024w X 768h ... and one must allow room for browser borders and other such peripheral things. Keeping height to no more than 650, even less depending on how the image is presented, is really a good way to go, IMO. No need to apologize frank - I don't think you've been "set straight" anyway.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: frank theriault > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:37:37 -0500, Paul Stenquist > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Frank, > > I think most photographers are running monitors with 1050 pixels on the > > vertical. But I've been keeping my files smaller lately after some > > complaints. > > Paul > > > > Hi, Paul, > > I didn't realize that. I'll keep the diatribes down to a dull roar > from now on. <vbg> > > Thanks for setting my straight, and my apologies to all.
