On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:19:27 -0500, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> <blush> I didn't know I had any artistic integrity to set aside in the
> first place!

Well, I was going to make a joke casting aspersions WRT your "artistic
integrity" (such as it is...), but thought that was going a bit too
far!  <LOL>
> 
> I'm angling for a deal in which I provide some prints and/or services as
> partial payment for a bicycle. I want to get a bike this spring so I've
> got to start scheming :) And since I know the bike shop owner to be a
> fan of the photographer up the street, I thought this would be a good
> start <evil grin>.

Bike?  Did someone say "bike"?  Lemme know what you get (c'mon, you
~know~ you're going to get one...).  Or, if you want any advice,
suggestions, etc...

> Another odd thing about this shot: I often find it difficult to make a
> print that lives up the how an image looks on the monitor. In this case
> just the opposite occurred: The 14 x 20 inch print looks much better
> than the image on the computer. Perhaps because it's so altered.
> 

Good!  We'll see it down at GFM (or maybe even on the drive down)  <g>.

cheers,
frank
-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to