I've had the ist D but am now I'm shooting a 20D, I dare say the 20D at 1600 looks -much- better than the ist D at 800. Would love an explanation- I'm quite happy to go with what works..
Cheers, Ryan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 2:44 AM Subject: Re: Hmm.. ist DS competition? > 8mp isn't enough of an improvement in resolution over 6mp to make much > difference, especially as > there will be an increase in noise at higher ISOs. This will have to be > removed by software which will > probably cost quality. If it's the usual Canon construction for their > lower end cameras the feel will just > be yucckie. > > Ryan Lee wrote: > > >http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos350d/ > >Canon 350D: About the same dimensions as the ist DS, 60g lighter, and 8 > >megapixels. Thoughts? > > > >Rgds, > >Ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. > During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings > and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. > --P.J. O'Rourke > > >
