On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Jens Bladt wrote: > No, sorry, my fingers are tired. It's a common 2.0 :-(. > But the 4/200mm (K or M) should be worth a few bucks.
The M is very common. The K not quite so. I believe they are optically different. Kostas
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Jens Bladt wrote: > No, sorry, my fingers are tired. It's a common 2.0 :-(. > But the 4/200mm (K or M) should be worth a few bucks.
The M is very common. The K not quite so. I believe they are optically different. Kostas