I've related here the story of a woman verbally attacking me for taking pictures near (not of) her in a market in Brisbane, she seemed to think she had some right of privacy, not for her own image, but of the stuff she had displayed for sale!
We as photographers need to make our voices heard, otherwise the paranoids and purse-lips in our community will soon make it an arrestable offence to be seen carrying a camera - something on the lines of "going equipped for pornography", as carrying a jemmy or a crowbar is seen as going equipped for burglary! It is (just) acceptable to ban photography at events such as concerts, where clearly there is a commercial element to the images which can be obtained there, but there should be no general restrictions in places which are public. If an image is offensive or otherwise illegal, prosecute the use of it or the possession of it where appropriate, but let's not be taking a sledgehammer to crack a walnut.
While I support the right of anyone to determine whether or not their image is used commercially, that cannot apply to the sort of candid photography which amateurs do, where the image is generally used only for their private satisfaction, or for very limited exhibition.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Shutter shutdown
All I can say is thank god I don't live in Australia, even with security it hasn't gotten that bad here yet.
Derby Chang wrote:
An interesting article from yesterdays Sydney Morning Herald. It isn't easy being a street photographer these days. The Rex Dupain anecdote is rather sad.
http://smh.com.au/articles/2005/02/25/1109180112027.html
(you might need to do the free registration)
D
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke

