On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:40:34 -0500, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:05:47 -0500, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just thought I would briefly introduce myself before I start posting > > erratically. I've been lurking for about a week or so and thoroughly > > enjoying the discussion, the obviously wonderful comraderie, the > > photographs, and quite a few of your personal sites. > > Welcome aboard. > > Have you seen this during your lurking? > > http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html Yup. I've spent quite a bit of time at Graywolf's site. Since we both own Graphics, I found it rather enlightening that someone out there is actually using one as it was intended. Imagine that! Using a press camera as as press camera! Now I just need some flash bulbs. > > You should post pix on PUG and as PAW's when you're able. It's always > nice to look at what everyone else is doing. I will. I've recently moved to a rather rural area in southern PA and no longer have access to a dark room or a local B&W lab. We left St. Louis to get away from the hustle, and now I find that I've taken quite a few aspects of city life for granted. <g> Looks like I'll be mailing my film out. I may switch to color process B&W for the time being. > > BTW, I've had an MX for a couple of years now (ironically, I got mine > from Mr. Robb, who thought he didn't like them at the time), and I > love it. I'm like you, mostly old, mostly mechanical (except my LX) > cameras. Good to hear it. I don't mind the automagical wunderplastiks so long as I can shoot manually as needed. But the *ist I bought last year for my wife has a been a sore disappointment in that area. (I apparently didn't do my research. That crippled mount sucks.) > > Anyway, looks like you're fitting in just fine. Oh yeah, you won' t > see this in the Mini-FAQ, but don't believe anything Mark Roberts > says... > > <vbg> > > cheers, > frank I'll keep in that in mind. :)
-- Scott Loveless Born free. Taxed to death.
