True - except for the cabinet part :-) Well my F is in the bag. But zooms are not for panoramas IMO. So, I use my M and K lenses frequently! Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 6. marts 2005 18:34 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: M 4/200mm vs F 4-5.6/70-210mm at 200mm That would be the expectation, but it's not as much better as one would expect. At least when comparing the M 200 and F 70-210 I own anyway. Marginal is the word I'd use. That's why the M stays in the cabinet and the F usually is in the bag. Jens Bladt wrote: >I took a few test shots today. >To see how the SMC-M 4/200mm is doing. >Not so bad - compared to the SMC F 4-5.6/70-210mm. >I think the prime is the sharper lens of the two. > >Both photographs shot at f 5.6 and app. 1/2000 sec. handheld. >No editing except autolevels and very little cropping (almost the full >frames). > >See for yourself: http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p12447314.html >Jens Bladt >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > > > -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
