I guess the Osram delivers a "hotter" light, that is higher Kelvin levels, than other/most flashes!!??
"Hot" and "cold" seem to be the opposite of how we normally think of colours, since a "redish" colour is often percieved as warmer than "blueish" colour, which we percieve/consider a cold light. In fact the opposite is the case. Blue starts/galaxes are hotter than the red stars/galaxes. (Or the blue stars/galxes are apporaching, pushing together the lightwaves - shorter wave lengths) red stars are moving away (pulling apart the lightwaves - longer wave lengths). Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 11. marts 2005 13:57 Til: [email protected] Emne: RE: Enablement When I first read your question, I couldn't say that I had, Kostas. But I justed tested the Osram against my AF280T and shots without a flash. You are right!! The Osram shots seem to have a slightly blueish cast!!! The AF280T shots are - colour wise - not different from shots witout a falsh! Why? Is it "common knowledge" that Osram flashes produce more "blueish" light than other or most flashes? Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 11. marts 2005 13:16 Til: [email protected] Emne: RE: Enablement On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Jens Bladt wrote: > I have been trying out the old Osram VM 300 (split beam) flash (non TTL) I > got with an ME. > It is BRILLIANT with the *ist D. I guess it's irrelevant for the -D, but have you diagnosed a (blue?) colour cast? Kostas
