On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:33:25AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 3/11/2005 10:52:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm talking about the colour you get from a default conversion, > before playing around with any levels, etc. > > Don't forget I don't have CS, only Elements 3.0, so I don't get > to play with the calibration tab in Adobe Camera Raw anyway. > > If anyone wants to play around with the image, I've put it at > > <http://jfwaf.com/PDML/CALLIOPE.ZIP> > > (warning: it's still 8+ MB, even after zip compression!) > > I just ask that you send me a copy of the converted image > (a 720 x 480 best-quality JPEG would be sufficient), and > a note saying which converter you used, and how much you > modified the default settings. > ======== > Interested, but not sure what you hope to prove. Think I missed something.
I'm not trying to "prove" anything so much as see what differences there are in the output from the various RAW converters. > Wouldn't different calibration on different monitors affect the results . . . They'd better not - that's the whole point of calibration.
