Hi!
I have tested both Tokina and Sigma sometime ago. In the optical
quality (contrast, sharpness, and fine details transferring) I have found
that Sigma is much better. But it has a larger distortion and if you want to
use Sigma for city landscapes or architectural shooting may be it will not
good passed for you.
Sorry I did not compare the AF speed. But Sigma has IF and its AF is
enough fast.
Sincerely yours,
Arthur Grokhovsky
-----Original Message-----
From: David Volkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 11:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range).
Do
any of you have thoughts on either of them? I shoot alot of action
so
auto focus speed is really important to me. Thanks for your help,
-David
