I think you may have had a bad Tamron, ASSEMBLED IN CHINA? John
---------- Original Message ----------- From: ����� ���������� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:07:06 +0300 Subject: RE: Opinions about Sigmas > Hi! > I have tested both Tamron 28-75/2.8 DI and Sigma EX 2.8/24-70 > together - one film, one camera. What should I say? > Tamron is more light, it has very-very fast AF. > Sigma is very bulky, and slow AF. > But (by the testing examples) Tamron has significant lower optical > quality as Sigma. I do not know why. > > Sincerely yours, > Arthur Grokhovsky > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:22 PM > To: ����� ���������� > Subject: Re: Opinions about Sigmas > > Hello �����, > > You should consider the Tamron 28-75/2.8 DI lens. It is reasonable > price and optically very good. I have it and am very pleased > with it. I have heard that the Sigma offering in that range is > not that good. > > Food for thought... > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce ------- End of Original Message -------
