I probably have opportunity to lay my hands on a 2.0/55, but I'd like to hear some oppinions first. Is there a great difference, appart from the extra 0.2 f-stop?
Thanks so far, Pancho
Sonar Aror wrote:
Yep, you're right. It's the K 55. Quite encouraging indeed, soft at wide open but then a typical Pentax prime (contrasty and sharp) when stoped down a bit. Thank you!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:44:40 +0100, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess you mean K 55mm 1.8 ? There is no M 55mm.
It is a bit soft wide open but very honest if you close a bit ... On a K body, it has the HUGE (for me) advantage that you see in the viewfinder the same way you see with your eyes. OK I know it is not clear at all but my English shows its limits here...
