Yes, thanks, THANKS Bruce for helping make used SMC lenses so much
more expensive for the rest of us.

:-)


No really, that's cool. I converted one or two to Pentax myself...

j


On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:56:57 +0000, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Dayton wrote:
> 
> > A friend of mine asked for help in picking a DSLR.  She has been using
> > a Nikon N75 with 28-80 zoom to date.  Prior to that she was using an
> > old Canon FD mount body.
> >
> > When she talked to me, she was just about ready to buy the D70 based
> > on internet hype and the local store being a strong Nikon seller.
> >
> > We discussed what she wanted to do with the camera now and in the not
> > too distant future.  Her indication was that, besides family/kid
> > memories, she had started into portraiture and wanted to continue that
> > direction.
> >
> > So with that in mind, I discussed and worked with her on the angle of
> > manually focusing and composing.  She is a convert away from AF for
> > this type of work now.  So suddenly the quality of the viewfinder
> > became very important.  The ability to clearly compose and focus on
> > the matte screen became among her most important features of the
> > camera.
> >
> > I sent her around to look at the D70, RebelXT, Evolt and DS bodies
> > with this in mind.  She came back and reported the order of usability
> > of the viewfinder for the stated purpose as
> > Pentax *istDS
> > Canon RebelXT
> > Olympus Evolt
> > Nikon D70
> >
> > Yesterday I stopped at the local store and tried the D70 and *istDS
> > side by side with 50mm lenses on each.  The D70 was barely usable (I
> > would hate it) and the *istDS was clearly better for this.
> >
> > So today she picked up her brand new *istDS.  I was very pleased that
> > someone would get past the hype and really pick something that would
> > work best for what they wanted to do.
> >
> That's a heartening story, Bruce.  It's often impossible [for me, at
> least 8-)] to get through people's preconceptions about products.  Many
> really do believe all the guff that advertising agencies throw out.
> Others simply can't be bothered to sort through it.
> 
> mike
> 
> 


-- 
Juan Buhler - SIGGRAPH 2005 Sketches and Posters Chair
http://www.jbuhler.com
photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com

Reply via email to