I have a 10D. I didn't buy a 20D as, for all it's advances, it didn't
impress me as being a step in the direction that *I* wanted. I bought a
Pentax *ist DS instead ... it moved in the direction of smaller,
lighter, sensibly priced, etc that was important to me.
Godfrey
On Mar 29, 2005, at 5:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 20D is only 8 megapixels. That's an almost insignificant
difference. And the viewfinder is crappy. I would hope that the next
APS Pentax is a considerable step up from the 20D. In fact, as K
Takehita (sp?) mentioned in this thread, the *ist D is in many ways a
better choice than the 20D.
I agree, seems to me that a 20D competitor is more important to the
health of Pentax than a 645D.
