there used to be a p67 brotherhood hat somewhere... long while ago. best, mishka
On Apr 1, 2005 4:47 PM, Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, divide by 4. Those postage stamp size negative users have to throw away > a 1/4 inch of their negative to print on standard size paper, and those > digi-weenies don't even have a negative to throw away (grin). It is a 32-127 > zoom equivalent. BTW, I just aquired four new (well two new, and two old) > fedoras to go with my Graphic. Now what other camera enables you to buy a new > hat. Now that is real enablement! > > graywolf > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > ----------------------------------- > > > William Robb wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mishka" > > Subject: Re: Future of DA lenses > > > > > >> hate to disappoint you, but no. > >> > >> just a 4x5. but a very, really, awfully nice one -- a pacemaker speed > >> graphic. > >> just ran a few test shots with its stock 127 (eh... 35? i can't see my > >> new math > >> calculator at the moment) ektar and provia 100 -- what a treat! now > >> all i need is > >> a rain-free weekend. > >> > >> i guess i am a sucker to small cameras with tiny negs (... compared to > >> 11x14 or > >> even 5x7) > >> > > > > I think divide by 3, more or less. > > Your 127 is really a 43!!!!!!! > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 3/31/2005 > >
