i think that the actual owners of such lenses are split about evenly between the people who have to have it to make a living and can objectively justify the cost of such a lens based on ROI, and the ones who are passionate enough about that kind of photography to be able to make it fit into their budgets. i'd bet most of the people on photo tours to such places as you went to in Alaska are avid amateurs, not working pros, and have equivalent lenses.

i know that i have many more images to come out of my A* 400/2.8, only a small fraction of which are going to be publishable. on a pure ROI basis, i can't be sure i'll ever make back the $5K i paid for the lens. OTOH, i know because i paid a lot, i am going to work at using it a lot to try and get the kind of shots that i've seen in the birding books and magazines. the ones i have gotten to date are good enough to say that i know i will get the ones i want in the future. for the birding work that i have started doing, the FA* 600/4 would better fit the bill, but i feel that the *istD's performance isn't up to what i need. 6 megapixels is enough, although certainly i would like more. it's AF performance, frame rate, and buffer size when shooting RAW that limit things. that's the main reason why instead of budgeting for a FA* 600/4, i'm budgeting for a Canon body and lens system.

Herb....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Longest lens name



I'm not sure anyone, except those making a living using them, could objectively justify lenses in these price ranges. But I have to say it doesn't take much success with one to make it seem worthwhile. I wanted a 600 for years, but couldn't "justify" it & made do with alternatives, none of which I was very happy with. Well a few years ago I was able to purchase a new 600 FA at substantial discount (still very expensive tho). During my last trip to Alaska I was able to witness many "rare" photographic opportunities & this time I had the equipment to do them justice. You know what, because of this experience, if I never take another image with the 600 I'll still be glad that I got it.




Reply via email to