On Apr 4, 2005 3:23 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moving continues to consume most of my time for the present, but I've > just gotten my desktop system back up and running so I can continue > with image processing now. :-) > > I've got two/three photos I'm working on for my People and Portraits > PAW, but this one popped out at me as an Other. > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/14p.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. >
Can't say it does much for me. cheers, frank ps: I was once severely taken to task for saying that a photo didn't do much for me. All it means is that it didn't move me. I'm not saying it's good or bad, it's not a value-judgment. It means just as it says. I often can't express why a certain photo has a huge emotional impact on me; it just does. This is the opposite. Doesn't mean it's a bad photo. Doesn't even mean that I didn't ~like~ it. Just didn't move me, is all. -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
