Good news on the Super Program.  Were you able to improve the cosmetics, or
was that just a non-issue?

As for the 135mm glass, it seems you've gotten a consensus on it.  Now go
find one and use it with pleasure.  

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: Don Sanderson 

> Thanks Shel!
>
> Don
>
> BTW: The Super Program lived! ;-)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shel Belinkoff 

> > I've had a couple - three of those lenses, and used an A*135/1.8 a few
> > times.  The K135/2.5 is a great lens by comparison, especially for the
> > money.  The size is quite a bit more handy as well.  IMO, especially
when
> > shooting hand held, the K135 is comparable to the A*135/1.8 
> > unless you must
> > have the wider aperture.  Putting them on a tripod, critically focusing,
> > using appropriate shutter speeds and film that can "see" the differences
> > between the lenses, and making large enough prints in which you can see
> > what the film sees, then by all means the A*135 is the better lens - but
> > not 5x to 8x better, which is about how much more the A* will 
> > cost over the K135.


Reply via email to